Artificial Intelligence and Fatwas

May Artificial Intelligence Be Asked for Fatwas and Islamic Rulings?

All praise is due to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family, and all his companions.

Artificial intelligence has become a fast way to access information, explain terminology, and summarize texts. Some Muslims therefore ask it about rulings concerning worship, transactions, family matters, and creed. However, the speed of an answer and the quality of its wording do not mean that it is correct. Likewise, citing a verse, hadith, or scholar's name does not establish that the quotation is accurate or that the ruling applies to the questioner's situation.

The brief answer is that it is permissible to ask artificial intelligence and benefit from it as a tool for research and preliminary understanding. Its automated answer, however, may not be treated as a fatwa, it may not be made into an independent mufti, and its answer may not be attributed to Allah's religion until its evidence and quotations have been verified. New issues and personal cases must be presented to a trustworthy scholar qualified to issue fatwas.

Why Is Artificial Intelligence Not a Mufti?
Article section

Why Is Artificial Intelligence Not a Mufti?

A fatwa is not a collection of words from books or websites. It is an explanation of the Islamic ruling after understanding the texts, distinguishing authentic hadiths from weak ones, reconciling the evidence, distinguishing general texts from specific ones, unrestricted texts from restricted ones, and abrogating texts from abrogated ones, knowing the positions of scholars, and understanding the true circumstances about which a person is asking.

The application of a ruling to a particular case may change because of legally significant details. This is not because Allah's established rulings change, but because two situations that appear similar may differ in their cause, condition, impediment, ability, intention, contract, or the rights of others.

Artificial intelligence, by contrast, is software that generates answers based on patterns and information with which it was processed or to which it has access. It may be correct or mistaken. It may confuse a stronger position with a weak one, attribute words to someone who never said them, quote a hadith with wording that is not established, or answer a case whose details it has not fully understood. It is also not a scholar known for knowledge, integrity, and religious caution, and it does not bear the Islamic responsibility of a mufti.

Evidence for Asking People of Knowledge and Verifying Information
Article section

Evidence for Asking People of Knowledge and Verifying Information

Allah Most High says:

{وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِنْ قَبْلِكَ إِلَّا رِجَالًا نُوحِي إِلَيْهِمْ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ} [al-Nahl: 43].

Meaning: {We sent before you only men to whom We revealed. Ask the people of knowledge if you do not know.}

Allah commanded those who do not know to ask the people of knowledge, those who possess knowledge of revelation. He did not command them to take their religion from every speaker or every answer that reaches them.

He also says:

{وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولَئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْئُولًا} [al-Isra: 36].

Meaning: {Do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, sight, and heart will all be questioned.}

Allah Most High also says:

{قُلْ إِنَّمَا حَرَّمَ رَبِّيَ الْفَوَاحِشَ مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا وَمَا بَطَنَ وَالْإِثْمَ وَالْبَغْيَ بِغَيْرِ الْحَقِّ وَأَنْ تُشْرِكُوا بِاللَّهِ مَا لَمْ يُنَزِّلْ بِهِ سُلْطَانًا وَأَنْ تَقُولُوا عَلَى اللَّهِ مَا لَا تَعْلَمُونَ} [al-Araf: 33].

Meaning: {Say: My Lord has only forbidden shameful deeds, whether open or secret, sin, unjust aggression, associating with Allah that for which He has sent down no authority, and saying about Allah what you do not know.}

He also says:

{وَلَا تَقُولُوا لِمَا تَصِفُ أَلْسِنَتُكُمُ الْكَذِبَ هَذَا حَلَالٌ وَهَذَا حَرَامٌ لِتَفْتَرُوا عَلَى اللَّهِ الْكَذِبَ إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَفْتَرُونَ عَلَى اللَّهِ الْكَذِبَ لَا يُفْلِحُونَ} [al-Nahl: 116].

Meaning: {Do not falsely declare with your tongues, "This is lawful and that is unlawful," fabricating lies against Allah. Indeed, those who fabricate lies against Allah will never succeed.}

Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-As, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, said that he heard the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, say:

"إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يَقْبِضُ العِلْمَ انْتِزَاعًا يَنْتَزِعُهُ مِنَ العِبَادِ، وَلَكِنْ يَقْبِضُ العِلْمَ بِقَبْضِ العُلَمَاءِ، حَتَّى إِذَا لَمْ يُبْقِ عَالِمًا اتَّخَذَ النَّاسُ رُؤُوسًا جُهَّالًا، فَسُئِلُوا فَأَفْتَوْا بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ، فَضَلُّوا وَأَضَلُّوا"

Meaning: "Allah does not take away knowledge by removing it from His servants. Rather, He takes away knowledge by taking the scholars, until no scholar remains and people appoint ignorant leaders. They are asked, and they issue fatwas without knowledge, so they go astray and lead others astray."

Agreed upon by al-Bukhari and Muslim.

These texts demonstrate the danger of speaking about Allah without knowledge and the obligation to refer matters to those qualified to address them. If a Muslim is commanded to verify the reliability of a person from whom he takes his religion, then verifying an automated answer whose source material and method of compilation are unknown is even more necessary.

The Method of the Companions and Early Muslims Regarding Fatwas
Article section

The Method of the Companions and Early Muslims Regarding Fatwas

The companions, may Allah be pleased with them, did not compete to issue fatwas or answer every question without verification. The Tabi'i Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Layla, may Allah have mercy on him, said:

"أَدْرَكْتُ فِي هَذَا المَسْجِدِ عِشْرِينَ وَمِائَةً مِنَ الأَنْصَارِ، وَمَا مِنْهُمْ مِنْ أَحَدٍ يُحَدِّثُ بِحَدِيثٍ إِلَّا وَدَّ أَنَّ أَخَاهُ كَفَاهُ الحَدِيثَ، وَلَا يُسْأَلُ عَنْ فُتْيَا إِلَّا وَدَّ أَنَّ أَخَاهُ كَفَاهُ الفُتْيَا"

Meaning: "I met one hundred and twenty of the Ansar in this mosque. None of them would narrate a hadith without wishing that his brother would spare him from narrating it, and none would be asked for a fatwa without wishing that his brother would spare him from issuing it."

Reported by al-Darimi.

Muhammad ibn Sirin, may Allah have mercy on him, said:

"إِنَّ هَذَا العِلْمَ دِينٌ، فَانْظُرُوا عَمَّنْ تَأْخُذُونَ دِينَكُمْ"

Meaning: "This knowledge is religion, so consider carefully from whom you take your religion."

Muslim cited it in the introduction to his Sahih.

The method of the early Muslims was to treat fatwas as a grave responsibility, verify reports, and refer what they did not know to someone more knowledgeable. They were not deceived by the speed of an answer or the elegance of its language.

The Difference between General Information and a Personal Fatwa
Article section

The Difference between General Information and a Personal Fatwa

This distinction is important when using artificial intelligence.

General Information

This means conveying a well-established ruling or explaining a general term, such as the number of obligatory prayers, the meaning of wudu, the location of a verse, or a broad definition of zakah. Artificial intelligence may be used for preliminary access to this information, provided the text and source are reviewed.

A Personal Fatwa

This means applying a ruling to the circumstances of a particular questioner, such as whether divorce occurred through specific words spoken under particular circumstances, how to divide an estate among multiple heirs, the ruling on a complex financial contract, bleeding experienced by a woman with varying characteristics and times, or the ruling concerning a person who said or did something related to creed.

A general answer is insufficient for these matters. They require clarification of details, determining what has been established, and perhaps hearing from the parties or reviewing a contract or document. They must therefore be presented to a trustworthy scholar or a recognized fatwa authority.

When Can Artificial Intelligence Be Useful?
Article section

When Can Artificial Intelligence Be Useful?

With verification, it may be used for beneficial purposes such as:

  1. Organizing a long question before sending it to a scholar.
  2. Providing a preliminary explanation of a term from fiqh or hadith studies.
  3. Suggesting search terms for finding a published fatwa from a trustworthy source.
  4. Locating a verse or hadith source as an initial research step.
  5. Summarizing a documented article or fatwa after comparing the summary with the original.
  6. Translating a published fatwa for someone who does not understand its language, while reviewing sensitive terminology and rulings.
  7. Collecting the issues that need to be asked of a scholar so none are forgotten.
  8. Preparing an educational draft that is later checked against original sources and reviewed by scholars when necessary.

An artificial intelligence answer does not become Islamic evidence merely because it is clearly written or agrees with what the questioner wants.

Matters in Which an Automated Answer Must Not Be Relied Upon
Article section

Matters in Which an Automated Answer Must Not Be Relied Upon

An automated answer may not be treated as the ruling on a particular case when a serious judgment or the rights of others are at stake. Such matters must be presented to a qualified scholar. They include:

  • Divorce, khul, revocation of divorce, iddah, and marriage rulings.
  • Takfir, declaring someone an innovator, and judgments concerning individuals or groups.
  • Inheritance, wills, debts, and financial rights.
  • Loans, financing, insurance, investments, and contemporary contracts.
  • Women's bleeding, pregnancy, miscarriage, and medical issues connected to worship.
  • Expiations, vows, and oaths when connected to a specific event.
  • Ruqyah and psychological or physical symptoms that may require medical diagnosis.
  • Family or legal disputes and matters in which the parties give different accounts.
  • Public issues concerning people's security, honor, or property.

In these areas, incomplete information can ruin a marriage, consume wealth unjustly, extinguish a right, falsely accuse a Muslim, or delay treatment. Saying, "Artificial intelligence said so," is not enough.

How Can Artificial Intelligence Make Mistakes?
Article section

How Can Artificial Intelligence Make Mistakes?

An incorrect answer may be expressed in confident, organized language, and it may combine accurate information with an incorrect conclusion. Possible errors include:

  1. Inventing a hadith, book, or page number that does not exist.
  2. Quoting an authentic hadith inaccurately or omitting an important qualification.
  3. Attributing a position to a scholar who never expressed it.
  4. Presenting an anomalous or weaker fiqh position as though it were agreed upon.
  5. Omitting a recognized disagreement or presenting an invalid disagreement as acceptable.
  6. Confusing a general ruling with a personal fatwa.
  7. Failing to notice differences in the true nature of a contract, legally recognized custom, regulations affecting the transaction, or the questioner's ability and circumstances.
  8. Building an answer upon an incomplete question or one framed to produce a result desired by its author.
  9. Relying on old, undocumented, or contextually incomplete material.

The accuracy of an answer is therefore not measured by its confident tone, but by sound evidence, correct understanding, a trustworthy source, and the applicability of the ruling to the actual case.

Steps for Verifying an Automated Answer
Article section

Steps for Verifying an Automated Answer

Identify the Nature of Your Question

Ask yourself: Am I looking for general information, or am I requesting a ruling about my own situation? If the question concerns rights, contracts, divorce, a judgment about a person in matters of creed, or a significant health issue, go to a trustworthy scholar and do not rely on the automated answer.

Ask for the Reference, but Do Not Trust It Merely Because It Is Present

Ask for the surah name and verse number, the hadith collection, hadith number and grade, and the scholar's name and book or fatwa. Remember, however, that writing a reference does not prove that it is authentic. The reference may be fabricated or may not support the stated ruling.

Compare the Quotation with the Original Source

Compare the verse with the Mushaf, the hadith with a trustworthy hadith source, and the scholar's words with the published original. Do not rely on an excerpt if what comes before or after it changes its meaning.

Verify Both the Hadith and Its Interpretation

Not every widely circulated hadith is authentic, and a hadith being authentic does not by itself mean that the user's interpretation is correct. It may be general but qualified by other evidence, may concern circumstances unlike the present case, or may be interpreted differently by scholars.

For a more detailed verification process, read How to Verify a Hadith or Islamic Information.

Consult Trustworthy Scholarly Sources

Search the websites of scholars known for knowledge and adherence to the Sunnah, or consult a recognized fatwa authority. Make sure that the published question matches your case in the details that affect the ruling. Similar titles do not mean identical rulings.

Do Not Follow the Easiest Position Merely Because It Suits Your Desire

If artificial intelligence presents several opinions, do not choose the easiest merely because it agrees with what you want. Ask a trustworthy scholar which position is supported by the evidence and which ruling applies to your case.

Present Material Details Honestly

Do not conceal a fact that changes the ruling, and do not frame the question to lead to a particular answer. State the words used, dates, amounts, contracts, ability, and circumstances honestly, while withholding people's names and anything there is no need to disclose.

Review Material Before Publishing It

Do not turn an artificial intelligence answer into a post, video, or religious graphic before reviewing its texts and sources. If an error is distributed to thousands of people, its harm becomes much wider, and deleting the post later may not remove the copies already circulating.

How Should You Choose a Scholar or Fatwa Authority?
Article section

How Should You Choose a Scholar or Fatwa Authority?

A Muslim should ask someone known for knowledge of the Qur'an and Sunnah, sound belief, adherence to evidence, religious caution, and careful verification, and whose qualification is recognized by scholars. Fame, a large following, high-quality production, or a quick answer is not enough.

If the matter is complex, the questioner should consult someone known to have expertise in that field. Contemporary financial transactions, inheritance, judicial matters, and medicine connected to Islamic rulings each contain details that may require a specialist who also possesses a sound Islamic foundation.

The questioner should not move between muftis searching for someone who agrees with his desires. If he receives two different answers, he should seek the more knowledgeable and cautious scholar and explain the previous answers so that the scholar can help him understand the correct position.

For further foundational guidance, read Seeking Beneficial Knowledge in Islam.

Protecting Privacy When Asking Questions
Article section

Protecting Privacy When Asking Questions

Do not enter people's names, identification or account numbers, addresses, private photographs, complete medical reports, or unnecessary details of sins into an artificial intelligence tool. Platforms differ in their policies for storing and using data, so those policies should be reviewed before sensitive information is entered.

A question can usually be phrased without revealing anyone's identity. A scholar issuing a fatwa about the case should be told the details that affect the ruling, while names and anything unnecessary remain concealed.

Frequently Asked Questions about Artificial Intelligence and Fatwas
Question and answer

May Artificial Intelligence Be Asked about an Islamic Ruling?

It may be asked for preliminary benefit and research, but its automated answer is not a fatwa upon which one relies. It must not be acted upon in personal or serious matters until it has been verified and referred to people of knowledge. The prohibition does not lie in merely typing the question; it lies in speaking about Allah without knowledge or acting upon an unreliable ruling through which an obligation or right may be lost.

Question and answer

Is It Enough for an Answer to Cite a Verse or Hadith?

No. The verse may be authentic but applied in the wrong place; the hadith may be weak or quoted inaccurately; or its meaning may differ from what the answer claims. The text, source, grade, and scholars' understanding must all be verified.

Question and answer

Can It Be Relied Upon for General Religious Information?

Its transmission of general information may be useful after verification, such as the number of prayers or the basic obligation of fasting. Even then, it must not be made into an Islamic source. The sources are the Qur'an and Sunnah as explained by the people of knowledge. Artificial intelligence is only a means of transmission that may be correct or mistaken.

Question and answer

What Is the Difference between Artificial Intelligence and a Search Engine?

A search engine generally presents links leading to sources, while artificial intelligence generates a composite answer that may not explain where each sentence came from. Both are tools, not muftis. The source must be opened, its author identified, and the accuracy of the report verified.

Question and answer

What Should I Do If It Quotes a Fatwa from a Trustworthy Website?

Open the original fatwa and confirm that the text has not changed and that its question matches your circumstances. If your matter is personal or involves significant details, resemblance to a published fatwa is not enough. Ask a scholar and present your complete situation.

Question and answer

Can Artificial Intelligence Weigh the Positions of Scholars and Choose the Strongest?

Its preference must not be relied upon independently. Weighing scholarly positions requires proper qualification, gathering the evidence, understanding scholars' words, and correctly identifying the point of disagreement. It may help collect positions and their sources for study, after which the result should be presented to a trustworthy scholar.

Question and answer

May It Be Used to Translate Fatwas?

It may be used as a translation tool, but the translation must be reviewed, especially terminology concerning creed, divorce, conditions, obligation, prohibition, and exceptions. A single mistranslated word may reverse the ruling. The translation should be published with a link to the original and the mufti's name, not as a fatwa issued by artificial intelligence.

Question and answer

May It Be Used to Write Religious Articles?

It may assist with organization, wording, and research, but every verse, hadith, attribution, and ruling must be reviewed before publication. If an article contains a preference between scholarly positions or an answer to a new issue, it must be presented to someone qualified to address it. The text must not be attributed to a scholar who has neither reviewed nor approved it.

Question and answer

Does Calling a Tool Islamic Make It Trustworthy?

No. Merely calling a tool Islamic or describing it as specialized in fatwas does not make its answers correct. If it belongs to a trustworthy scholarly institution, conveys approved texts, and every answer is reviewed by qualified scholars before publication, reliance is placed on the institution's review and its scholars' approval, not on the automated generation itself. An automated answer that has not been reviewed by a qualified scholar still requires verification even if its interface bears an Islamic name.

Question and answer

What Should I Do If It Gives Me Two Contradictory Answers?

Do not repeatedly rephrase the question until you receive the answer you want. Identify the points of disagreement, retain the cited sources, and present the question and both answers to a trustworthy scholar. The contradiction may result from missing details, differing scholarly positions, or an error by the tool.

Question and answer

Should a Fatwa Be Attributed to Artificial Intelligence?

Artificial intelligence is not an Islamic authority to which a fatwa may be attributed. Once a ruling has been verified, attribute the verse to its location, the hadith to its source, and the fatwa to the scholar or institution that issued it. If the source is unknown, do not publish the ruling.

Question and answer

What Should Someone Do If No Scholar Is Nearby?

Artificial intelligence may be used to find the website of a trustworthy scholar or recognized fatwa authority, or to organize and send the question. A scholar being geographically distant does not turn software into a qualified mufti. Questions may be asked by telephone, correspondence, or official platforms. If the matter is urgent and may result in medical, safety, or legal harm, the appropriate professional must also be consulted, and prevention of harm must not be delayed while waiting for an automated answer.

Question and answer

May It Be Relied Upon in Divorce Cases?

It may explain general rulings, but it must not be relied upon to determine whether a particular divorce has or has not occurred. A qualified scholar or recognized fatwa authority must be consulted, with the exact wording, circumstances, intention, number, date, and any previous divorce disclosed, because omitting a single detail may change the ruling.

Question and answer

May It Be Relied Upon for Takfir or Declaring Someone an Innovator?

It must not be relied upon to judge individuals. Takfir and declaring people innovators are among the gravest subjects and involve conditions, impediments, and details that must be referred to deeply grounded scholars. A questioner may not collect automated excerpts and apply these rulings to particular people.

Question and answer

How Should Someone with Waswas Use It?

He should not make the tool a means of endlessly repeating the same question or collecting contradictory answers, because this may intensify obsessive doubt. He should obtain the ruling from a trustworthy scholar, follow it, and consult a qualified mental health professional about obsessive-compulsive symptoms when needed. He should not repeat the search whenever a new doubt occurs.

Question and answer

Is Someone Excused for Following an Incorrect Automated Answer?

It is not enough for a person to say, "I followed what the program said," when he was able to verify the matter and ask people of knowledge, especially in serious issues. Every Muslim must be mindful of Allah according to his ability, refrain from deliberately following what suits his desires, and avoid publishing anything he has not verified.

Question and answer

May Islamic Institutions Use Artificial Intelligence?

They may use it for indexing, research, translation, managing questions, and similar tasks, provided that qualified human reviewers check the output before it is attributed to the institution or published. Reliance is then placed upon the responsible scholars' approval and corrections, not merely upon the system having generated the answer.

Conclusion
Key takeaway

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence is a tool that may shorten research time and help organize a question or understand some information. It does not replace a scholar, turn probability into certainty, or make an undocumented report into an Islamic fatwa.

The safe path is to benefit from it without surrendering your religion to it: verify verses and hadiths, open the original sources, ask people of knowledge about personal cases, and publish no ruling until its accuracy is established. Whoever says, "I do not know," or pauses until he can ask, protects himself from speaking about Allah without knowledge, and this is closer to mindfulness of Allah and trustworthiness.